Frankfurt School

​Did you know that most of the men that created the Frankfurt School were mostly Jewish

Let's begin by considering the corrosive work of the Frankfurt School: a group of German-American scholars, mostly Jewish, who developed highly provocative and original perspectives on contemporary society and culture, drawing on Hegel, Marx, Nietzsche, Freud, and Weber.

Their idea of a “cultural revolution” was not particularly new. Joseph, Comte de Maistre

(1753-1821), who for fifteen years had been a Freemason, had this to say: “Until now,

nations were killed by conquest, that is by invasion. But here an important question arises:

can a nation not die on its own soil, without resettlement or invasion, by allowing the flies

of decomposition to corrupt to the very core those original and constituent principles

which make it what it is?”

What was the Frankfurt School?

Well, in the days following the Bolshevik Revolution in Russia, it was believed that a Workers’

Revolution would sweep into Europe and, eventually, into the United States. It failed to

do so. Towards the end of 1922, the Communist International (Comintern) began to consider

the reasons for this failure.

On Lenin’s initiative, a meeting was organized at the Marx-Engels Institute in Moscow.

The aim of the meeting was to throw light on the meaning of Marx’s Cultural

Revolution. What did “cultural revolution” entail? What was it all about?

First, among those present, was Georg Lukács, a Jewish Hungarian aristocrat and son

of a banker. He had become a Communist during World War I. A good Marxist theoretician,

he had developed the idea of “Revolution and Eros” — sexual instinct used as an

instrument of destruction.

Then there was Willi Münzenberg, another revolutionary Jew whose proposed solution to

the problems besetting society was “to organize the intellectuals and use them to make

Western civilization stink. Only then, after they have corrupted all its values

and made life impossible, can we impose the dictatorship of the proletariat.”

“It was”, said Ralph de Toledano (1916-2007), the conservative author and co-founder of

the National Review, “a meeting more harmful to Western civilization than the Bolshevik

Revolution itself.”

Lenin died in 1924, but by that time Stalin had risen to power and was beginning to look

on Willi Munzenberg, George Lukács and other Jewish revolutionaries (like Trotsky) as

dangerous Marxist “revisionists”, introducing concepts into Marxism that were alien to

Marxism and which served only a Jewish agenda.

In June 1940, on Stalin’s orders, Münzenberg was hunted down to the

south of France by a NKVD assassination squad and hanged from a tree.

In the summer of 1924, after being attacked for his writings by the Fifth Comintern

Congress, Lukács moved to Germany. Here he chaired the first meeting of a group of

Communist oriented sociologists. This gathering was to lead to the foundation

of the Frankfurt School.

This school 'designed' to put flesh on their revolutionary program, was started at the

University of Frankfurt in the Institut für Sozialforschung. To begin with, school and

institute were indistinguishable. In 1923, the Institute had been officially established, and

funded by Felix Weil (1898-1975). Weil, born in Argentina into a wealthy Jewish family,

was sent to attend school in Germany at the age of nine. He attended the universities in

Tübingen and Frankfurt, where he graduated with a doctoral degree in political science.

While at these universities he became increasingly interested in socialism and Marxism.

Carl Grünberg, the Institute’s Jewish director from 1923-1929, was an avowed Marxist,

although the Institute did not have any official party affiliations. But in 1930 Max Horkheimer

(also Jewish) assumed control. He believed that Marx’s theory should be the basis

of the Institute’s research.

When Hitler came to power, the Institute was closed and its members, by various

routes, fled to the United States and ended up as academics at major

US universities: Columbia, Princeton, Brandeis, and California at Berkeley.

The fact that they spoke very poor English was no disqualification. They

were Jewish, and so they managed to obtain prestigious academic appointments

through Jewish influence, i.e., through networking — a system that works

exceptionally well even today and which accounts for the huge and unfair

preponderance of Jews in academia.

The School included among its members the 1960s guru of the New Left Herbert Marcuse

— denounced by Pope Paul VI for his theory of liberation which “opens the way for [sexual]

licence cloaked as liberty” — Max Horkheimer, Theodor Adorno, the popular writer Erich

Fromm, Leo Lowenthal, and Jurgen Habermas. All these individuals except Habermas

were of Jewish origin.

Basically, the Frankfurt School believed that as long as an individual had the belief

— or even the hope of belief — that his divine gift of reason could solve the problems facing

society, then that society would never reach the state of hopelessness and

alienation that they considered necessary to provoke a socialist revolution.

Their task, therefore, was as swiftly as possible to undermine the “Judaeo-Christian legacy.”

“Judeo-Christian” is an oxymoron, a contradiction in terms, given that

Judaism and Christianity are at opposite ends of the religious spectrum. Since

most Jews are actively hostile to Christianity, and since Talmudic Jews actually

take pleasure in the thought of Christ being boiled in excrement in hell,

to speak of the “Judeo-Christian legacy” is clearly nonsensical.

To undermine Western civilization, the Frankfurt School Jews called for the most negative

and destructive criticism possible of every sphere of life. To de-stabilize society and bring it

to its knees, to engineer collapse, to produce crisis and catastrophe — this became the aim

of these maladjusted and mentally sick Jewish revolutionaries masquerading as

high-powered intellectuals.

Their policies, they hoped, would spread like a virus — “continuing the work

of the Western Marxists by other means”, as one of their members noted.

To further the advance of their “quiet” cultural revolution, the Frankfurt School made the following twelve recommendations — all of them calculated to undermine the foundations of society and create the dystopia we now see all around us:

1. The creation of racism offences and hate speech laws.

2. Continual change to create confusion (e,g., in school curricula).

3. Masturbation propaganda in schools, combined with the homosexualization of children

and their corruption by exposing them to child porn in the classroom.

4. The systematic undermining of parental and teachers’ authority.

5. Huge immigration to destroy national identity and foment future race wars.

6. The systematic promotion of excessive drinking and recreational drugs.

7. The systematic promotion of sexual deviance in society.

8. An unreliable legal system with bias against the victims of crime.

9. Dependency on state benefits.

10. Control and dumbing down of media. (Six Jewish

companies now control 96 percent of the world’s media. LD).

11. Encouraging the breakdown of the family.

12. All all-out attack on Christianity and the emptying of churches.

In the Soviet Union, under Stalin and his Communist Jews, the emptying

of churches was accomplished by the simple expedient

of burning the churches down—thousands of them.

(See here, here, here, here and here for more details on the systematic destruction

of Christian churches and the persecution of Russian Christians under the

Jewish leaders of the Russian Revolution. See also extended endnote.)

Coincidentally, most of the 12 aims and objectives mentioned above were set out prominently in the pages of that alleged “forgery”, The Protocols of the Elders of Zion.

The Jewish philosophers of the Frankfurt School, it seems, had been heavily

influenced by the Protocols. They were clearly impressed by what they read

there and decided to implement its recommendations in their own sinister agenda.

One of the main ideas of the Frankfurt School was to exploit Freud’s idea of

“pansexualism”: the search for indiscriminate sexual pleasure, the promotion

of “unisex”, the blurring of distinctions between the sexes, the overthrowing

of traditional relationships between men and women, and, finally, the undermining

of heterosexuality at the expense of homosexuality — as, for example, in the

idea of “same-sex marriage” and the adoption of children by homosexual couples.

Jew Willi Münzenberg summed up the Frankfurt School’s long-term

operation thus: “We will make the West so corrupt that it stinks.”

“We must organise the intellectuals and use them TO MAKE WESTERN CIVILIZATION


IMPOSSIBLE, can we impose the dictatorship of the proletariat.” (Emphasis added)

LD: According to Sean McMeekin’s The Red Millionaire: A political biography

of Willi Münzenberg, Münzenberg was “the perpetrator of some of the most

colossal lies of the modern age…. He helped unleash a plague of moral blindness

upon the world from which we have still not recovered.”

The Frankfurt School believed there were two types of revolution: (a) Political revolution

and (b) Cultural revolution. They were more concerned with cultural revolution, the demolition

of the established order from within. “Modern forms of subjection are marked by mildness”,

they taught. So-called “reforms” were to be made so slowly and subtly that these changes

for the worse were barely perceptible. The School saw the undermining of the social order

as a long-term project.

The systematic erosion of Christian moral values and the promotion

of sexual perversion is known as cultural Marxism. Today, thanks to the efforts

of organized Jewry which controls 96 percent of the world’s media, cultural

Marxism has largely triumphed and Christianity lies in ruins. To many dispassionate

observers, society has now reached its rockbottom moral nadir — as Jewish Marxists

such as Willi Munzenberg (see quote above) would have been

only too happy to witness — had he been around today.

These iconoclasts kept their sights firmly fixed on the family, education, media,

sex and popular culture. Each of these would be their target. If things did not

go from bad to worse, year after year, they were not succeeding. To these

revolutionary Jewish thinkers, bad was good — and worse was better.

The Destruction of the Family and the Promotion of Feminism

The School’s Critical Theory preached that the “authoritarian personality” was a product of

the patriarchal family — an idea directly linked to Engels’ Origins of the

Family, Private Property and the State, which promoted matriarchy.

Already Karl Marx had written, in the Communist Manifesto (1848), about the radical

notion of a “community of women”. In The German Ideology (1845), he had written disparagingly

about the idea of the family as the basic unit of society. This was one of the

basic tenets of the Critical Theory: the need to break down the family unit.

All families were essentially evil, these thinkers believed — even happy

families — so they had to be destroyed. It was better if children had no parents,

or did not know who their parents were. Or if they were orphans of the state.

It was better if romantic love between the sexes, leading to stable long-term

marriages, were destroyed in favor of short-term, unstable, promiscuous relationships.

After all, the former might lead to happiness for all concerned, and that was

clearly impermissible — for the whole point of the Cultural Revolution was

“to create a culture of pessimism” (Lukács) and “to make life impossible for

everyone.” (Münzenberg).

“I want a culture of pessimism … a world abandoned by God”

...Georg Lukacs (1885 - 1971)

The Institute scholars therefore preached that “Even a partial breakdown of parental authority

in the family might tend to increase the readiness of a coming generation to accept social change.”

These neo-Freudian Marxist philosophers of the Frankfurt School were

clearly out to create trouble: to drive a wedge between parent and child and

sow division in the family. Whatever was good in human relationships simply

had to be destroyed. If people didn’t have problems, then problems would

have to be manufactured “to make life impossible.” (Munzenberg).

All this prepared the way for the warfare against the masculine gender promoted by Marcuse

under the guise of “Women’s liberation” and by the New Left movement in the 1960s.

They proposed transforming our culture into a female-dominated one.

The idea that women should run society and wear the trousers, telling

men what to do, had an enormous appeal to certain bossy types of women

with a surplus of testosterone, particularly to butch lesbians and man-hating

matriarchs. Many of these misguided females were to become evangelists for

radical Feminism, some even proposing to cut themselves off from the male

sex completely and live in communes of their own. Curiously enough,

the numberof Jewish feminists is huge—out of all proportion to

their percentage in the population

In 1933, Wilhelm Reich, an honored and adulated member of the Frankfurt School, wrote

in The Mass Psychology of Fascism that matriarchy was the only genuine family

type of “natural society.” He was, as such, to be an inspiration to the feminists.

Reich, incidentally, a compulsive masturbator and sexual pervert, had

entertained incestuous longings for his own mother and

practiced bestiality with horses while still a child. (See here).

This versatile sexual deviant, now a cult figure on the left, along with the

equally sex-obsessed Herbert Marcuse—popularizer of the slogan MAKE LOVE,

NOT WAR—were to be godfathers of the Sexual Revolution of

the 1960s as well as the patron saints of the Feminist movement.

The Indoctrination of Children through Education

Bertrand Russell was to join the Frankfurt School in their efforts at mass social engineering.

He spilled the beans in his 1951 book, The Impact of Science on Society. He wrote:

“The social psychologists of the future will have a number of classes of school children

on whom they will try different methods of producing an unshakable conviction that

snow is black. Various results will soon be arrived at. First, that the influence of

home is obstructive. Second, that not much can be done unless indoctrination begins

before the age of ten. Third, that verses set to music and repeatedly intoned are

very effective. Fourth, that the opinion that snow is white must be held to show a morbid

taste for eccentricity.

But I anticipate. It is for future scientists to make these maxims precise and discover

exactly how much it costs per head to make children believe that snow is black, and

how much less it would cost to make them believe it is dark gray.

When the technique has been perfected, every government that has been in charge

of education for a generation will be able to control its subjects securely without the

need of armies or policemen.”

The irony is unmistakable, but that is beside the point. Russell was all

for turning the world upside down and ushering in Brave New World: atheism, feminism,

and “sexual liberation” i.e., the green light to promiscuity, perversion, and abortion on demand.

The devaluation of values so sought after by the luminaries of the Frankfurt

School has now largely been achieved through sex education and media propaganda:

in particular, by the promotion of masturbation, pornography, and the systematic high

pressure salesmanship of homosexuality in schools.

This, then, is the secret agenda of organized Jewry as represented by the

Cultural Marxists of the Frankfurt School: the destruction of traditional values, the

destruction of the moral order, the destruction of the family unit, the destruction of

religion, the destruction of meaning and purpose, and, finally, the destruction of

happiness itself.

These are the people who now rule over us. They are in control. They create new

wars with the same rapidity that a stage magician pulls rabbits from a hat. And they

make sure that the people they rule over, their subject populations, are either demoralized

debt slaves in insecure jobs or unemployed bums living on state benefits and a diet of

junk food and sleazy junk entertainment laid on by the Jews.

Satan’s Secret Agents have been only too successful in creating

a New World Order that bears a remarkable resemblance to hell.

Fifteen years after the Bolshevist Revolution was launched to carry out the

Marxist program, the editor of the American Hebrew could write: “According

to such information that the writer could secure while in Russia a few

weeks ago, not one Jewish synagogue has been torn down, as have

hundreds—perhaps thousands of the Greek Catholic Churches… In

Moscow and other large cities one can see Christian churches in the

process of destruction… the Government needs the location for a

large building,” (American Hebrew, Nov. 18, 1932, p. 12) Apostate Jews,

leading a revolution that was to destroy religion as the “opiate of the

people” had somehow spared the synagogues of Russia.” (“Democracy

and World Dominion,” 1939, p.211).

Wikipedia tells us that the Communist state after the 1917 Bolshevik Revolution was

“committed to the destruction of religion”, and destroyed churches, mosques and temples

— no mention of synagogues being destroyed — and that it “ridiculed, harassed and

executed [Christian] religious leaders, flood[ing] the schools and media with atheistic propaganda.”

Since the Russian Revolution was essentially a Jewish revolution, with an overwhelmingly

high percentage of its leaders being Jewish, one can understand why synagogues were NOT

destroyed. The animosity of the Jewish leadership was directed almost exclusively toward

the Christian clergy and their churches. Monks, nuns and priests were put to death in large

numbers, often after being cruelly tortured in the process, their eyes gouged out and in

some instances being boiled alive. (For graphic details of the systematic torture of Christians

under the Bolsheviks, see here and section 7.

According to the Atlantic, September 1991, p.14, “In 1919, three-quarters of the Cheka

staff in Kiev were Jews, who were careful to spare fellow Jews. (See footnote 21, here)

For more on the specifically Jewish character of the Russian Revolution, see here and here.

Russian-born Jewish writer Sonya Margolina goes so far as to call the Jewish role in supporting

the Bolshevik regime the “historic sin of the Jews.” She points, for example, to the prominent

role of Jews as commandants of Soviet Gulag concentration and labor camps, and

the role of Jewish Communists in the systematic destruction of Russian churches.

Moreover, she goes on, “The Jews of the entire world supported Soviet power,

and remained silent in the face of any criticism from the opposition.”

In light of this record, Margolina offers a grim prediction:

“The exaggeratedly enthusiastic participation of the Jewish Bolsheviks in

the subjugation and destruction of Russia is a sin that will be avenged.

Soviet power will be equated with Jewish power, and the furious hatred

against the Bolsheviks will become hatred against Jews.” (Cited here)


This is the long overdue study of the Frankfurt School

and Cultural Marxist philosophy which now controls

Western intellectualism, politics, and culture. It was by design;

it was created by an internationalist intelligentsia to

eradicate Western values, social systems, and European

racial groups in a pre-emptive attempt to spark glob

The film below never mentions the race of the members of the Frankfurt School, which in the long run adds to its value because it maintains it objectivity in that manner. We can mention the race of those destroyers of Western Civilization: they were all Jews. No wonder.